Legal Opinion
Smith v. Bond
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1924No. 15216PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson
A certificate of importance having been granted, this appeal is prosecuted to review a judgment of the Appellate Court for the Third District reversing a judgment of the circuit court of Vermilion county allowing certain claims against the estate of James A. Cunningham, deceased.
Prior to his death Cunningham was a member of the firm of Hamilton & Cunningham, a partnership engaged in banking. Appellee, Nathan Bond, is administrator of the estate of Cunningham and receiver of the estate of Hamilton & Cunningham. Many depositors and others having claims against the bank filed their claims…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ostrander v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Orleans County National Bank v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Canton Union Coal Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Worcester Color Co. v. Henry Wood's Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Snow v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Amos v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1966
- Sheffield Poly-Glaz, Inc. v. HUMBOLDT GLASS, CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Quaintance Associates, Inc. v. PLM, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Morel v. Coronet Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.