Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Sea & Sky Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 1981No. 8028SC696PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Defendants make one argument on appeal, that the court erred in signing and entering the order of foreclosure. Defendants did not make any exceptions to the findings of fact or conclusions of law made by the court in its order. Therefore, the findings of fact are deemed to be (and are in fact) supported by substantial competent evidence and are conclusive upon appeal. Schloss v Jamison, 258 N.C. 271, 128 S.E.2d 590 (1962); In re Vinson, 42 N.C. App. 28, 255 S.E.2d 644 (1979). The findings of fact support the conclusions of law and the entry of the order allowing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Power Co. v. . Clay CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Matter of VinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Matter of EnochCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Adams v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson Chevrolet/Olds, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Roberts v. HeffnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API