Legal Opinion

Smith v. Vermont Marble Company

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 5, 1926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

The action is ejectment for a piece of quarry land in the town of Pittsford. The defendant’s answer contains the general issue and asserts title by adverse possession. The trial below was before a referee, on whose report judgment was rendered for the recovery of a part, only, of the premises in question. The plaintiff brings the case here on exceptions. The case was argued in this Court at the May Term, 1923, and when, at our last May Term, an opinion was handed down which reversed and remanded the case, the defendant filed a motion for reargument. In due course, this motion was granted, and…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Lewis v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. PullenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Yelverton v. SteeleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Barber v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
  5. Lewis v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Peeples v. Port of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Phillips v. PlastridgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  3. Cahill v. MorrowSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  4. Russell v. PareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  5. Dieter v. ScottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API