Mitchell v. Green
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to determine adverse claims to vacant and unoccupied property. The answer of defendant Green alleged that defendant was the owner and in possession of the property described and -that plaintiff had no title or interest therein. The case was tried before Waite, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant Green appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
This is an action to determine adverse claims to lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of block 3 in Kees’ Addition to Minneapolis. Plaintiff alleged that she is the owner and entitled to the possession of the lots; and that they are vacant and unoccupied, except that defendant Green had wrongfully trespassed upon and used them to some extent. Defendant Green, the only defendant who interposed an answer, denied plaintiff’s title, alleged title in himself, and asked judgment establishing and confirming such title. The court found that plaintiff is the owner in fee of the lots, free and clear from any…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mackellar v. PillsburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Todd v. WeedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Sage v. RudnickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Bristol Savings Bank v. JuddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Olson v. BurkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Butler v. Dillehay Brick Company's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- In Re the Estate of AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Wortman v. SiedowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Cluss v. HackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.