Grover v. Sherman

Appellants insist that the finding of negligence on Sherman’s part is not sustained by the evidence. The evidence does show that appellant was on the north side (his right side) of the road close to the ditch when the other car driven by defendant Rooke, who had come into highway 48 from left of the center of 24, swung in front of appellant’s car.

The defendant Rooke did not appear in the case, filed no answer, and permitted judgment-to go against him by default. His negligence was conceded by him in conversation after the collision and it was clearly proven. The only witnesses *154to the…