Hensel v. Hensel Yellow Cab Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The first contention made by the defendant is that there is no evidence to justify the jury’s finding of negligence with respect to lookout, management, and control. In its instructions to the jury the court made no reference to the fact that the plaintiff was a guest either of her husband or of the company. The instructions given in regard to the first question of the special verdict relate to ordinary negligence and are in no way qualified. The defendant requested no instructions upon these points, and it is apparent from the record counsel considered and so informed the court that the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Wick v. WickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Maine v. James Maine & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Zinc Carbonate Co. v. First National Bank of ShullsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Koontz v. Messer & Quaker State Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Terpstra v. Soiltest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Mullally v. Langenberg Bros. Grain Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Wright Ex Rel. Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Young v. Nunn, Bush & Weldon Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.