Legal Opinion

Pierner v. Mann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1946PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The action was brought by Myrtle E. Pierner against Jack Mann, the owner and driver of an automobile; and his insurer, and against the insurer of her husband, to recover for injuries sustained by her in an automobile collision on a highway alleged to have been caused by the negligence of Mann and by that of her husband in whose automobile she was riding as a guest.

The complaint demanded judgment against Mann and the two insurers. Mann asked that Pierner be interpleaded as a defendant, alleged negligence on his part as charged in the plaintiff’s complaint as to lookout and control of his car,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cleary v. EckartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Sommerfield v. FluryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Knipfer v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Poneitowcki v. HarresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Scharine v. HuebschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tillman v. Great American Indemnity Co. Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  2. Thorp v. LandsawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Home Savings Bank v. BentleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Johnsen v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Walter v. ShemonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API