Legal Opinion

People v. Meyers

California Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 14382PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action brought by the district attorney of Alameda County in the name of the People of the state to recover against sureties the amount of a forfeited bail bond. On June 29, 1926, a complaint was made against Mrs. E.' W. Breed in the justice’s court of the city of Oakland, charging her with the violation of section 476 of the Penal Code, a felony. She was held to answer on October 11, 1926, and her bail was set at $1,000. Defendants furnished a bail bond in the language of section 1278 of the Penal Code, as it then read, the condition being expressed as follows: “We . . .…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. MagaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  3. State v. FunkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Belding v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1869
  5. McDonald v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. People v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ringle Development Corporation v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People v. TingcungcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. State v. LiakasNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API