Legal Opinion
Inre: Procter & Gamble Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 24, 2014No. 14-121PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION
ORDER
TARANTO, Circuit Judge.
Clio USA, Inc., petitioned the Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office to institute inter partes reviews of three patents owned by The Proctor & Gamble Company (P & G). The Director, through her delegee, granted the petitions. P & G now petitions this court to issue a writ of mandamus that would direct the PTO to withdraw the orders instituting inter partes reviews of the three P & G patents.
In today’s decision in St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Div., Inc. v. Volcano Corp., No. 2014-1183, 749 F.3d 1373, 2014 WL 1623676 (Fed.Cir.2014), we…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. Volcano Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- In Re Dominion Dealer Solutions, LLC.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LPSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Achates Reference Publishing, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd. v. Athena Automation Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.