State v. Flath
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBuee, J.
Upon the refusal of the district court to issue' a writ of habeas corpus the defendant applied to this court.
The state’s attorney filed with a justice of the peace six'criminal complaints charging the defendant with violation of the provisions of ■chapter 167 of the Session Laws of 1923 being section 9562a of the Supplement. This statute reads: • •
“Every person who shall take any indecent liberty with or- on the person of any child, which act under law does not amount.to rape, or attempt to commit rape, or assault, with intent to commit rape, or sodomy, or other crime against nature, shall be…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. HicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Meisner v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1924
- Miller v. FineganSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sorenson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. FlathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Lanier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.