Legal Opinion

Miller v. Finegan

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Raney, C. J.:

The first question to be disposed of in this case is whether Joseph Finegan, the intestate, was at Jhe Jimq of his death, ISfoverpbey 3, 1885, the “heqd of a *31family residing in this State,” within the meaning of the first section of the ninth article of the Constitution of 1868. That he and his wife were at the time occupying the land as a home, is not denied, and that husband and wife, living together, constitute a family within the spirit and intent of homestead legislation, whether it be in the form of organic or of more mutable law, is a sound and recognized proposition.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reeves v. GoodnerTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Wilson v. FridenbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1885
  3. Kitchell v. BurgwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Wilson v. FridenburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1882

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Pasco v. HarleySupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Public Health Tr. of Dade Cty. v. LopezSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Hill v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  4. Church v. Lee Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Hill v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1917

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API