Legal Opinion

State v. Flath

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1931No. File No. 69PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CheistiaNsoN, Oh. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of taking indecent liberty with the person of a child in violation of the provisions of chapter 167, Laws 1923 (§ 9562a, Supplement to the Compiled Laws of 1913) and appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The statute for the violation of which defendant was convicted reads as follows:

“’Every person who shall take any indecent liberty with or on the person of any child, which act under law does not amount to rape, or attempt to commit rape, or assault, with intent to commit…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  2. Cothron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  3. State v. HazletNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  4. People v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brasher v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Commonwealth v. BouldenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Hinton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. State v. OsierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. StevensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API