Smith v. Mangels
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Jr, Superior Court Judge.
■ This action was commenced by Elmer A. Smith and Icey M. Smith, his wife, as plaintiffs, appellants herein, against Ralph A. Mangels, real estate broker, Cora E. Atkinson, his saleswoman, and the United States Guaranty and Fidelity 'Company of Baltimore, Maryland, a corporation, surety for Mangels on his broker’s license, to recover damages for failure to disclose certain material facts concerning the real estate transaction hereinafter set forth. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants at the conclusion of the plaintiffs’ case and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Freiberg, Kline & Co. v. MagaleTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Seamen's Bank for Savings v. SmadbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- McKleroy v. DishmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Stein v. McAuleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Sorenson v. DawdyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Thompson v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Darnell v. DentonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Deming National Bank v. WalravenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Arizona Title Insurance and Trust Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.