Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. Dawdy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 20, 1946No. 14784PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Justice.

Michael Sorenson and Emil Sorenson, doing business as Capitol Securities Company, hereinafter called plaintiffs in garnishment, held a judgment against H. A. Dawdy, and procured a writ of garnishment against First National Bank of Fort Worth, Texas, hereinafter called garnishee. The garnishee answered; the pertinent parts thereof were in this language:

“That it is not now nor was it at the time said writ of garnishment was served upon it indebted in anything or amount to the defendant H. A. Dawdy; that at the time said writ was served upon it the defendant (garnishee) bank had…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bednarz v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. American Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Johnson v. Amarillo Improvement Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. West Realty & Investment Co. v. HiteTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Allison v. GroppenbacherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shindler v. Marr & Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  2. New v. First National Bank of MidlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Birdwell v. Pacific Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Banco Longoria, S. A. v. El Paso National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Christian v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API