Legal Opinion
Hillman v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1988No. S-1669PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Following the death of their eleven year old daughter, John and Janet Hillman filed suit against Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company for benefits under the uninsured motorists and medical payments sections of their automobile insurance policy issued by Nationwide. Nationwide denied liability, claiming that the policy provides no coverage in this instance. After making several important but non-dispositive rulings, the superior court granted Nationwide’s motion for summary judgment and entered a final judgment dismissing the Hillmans’ complaint. This appeal…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Upshaw v. Trinity CompaniesTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Hillman v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Flisock v. State, Division of Retirement & BenefitsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, in 90-1534 v. Earl D. Hampton, Jr., Earl D. Hampton, Sr. And Barbara Hampton, in 90-1523Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- University of Alaska v. TumeoAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.