Upshaw v. Trinity Companies
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNYN, Justice.
We consider in this appeal whether stacking1 of policy limits for underinsured motorist coverage in a single multi-vehicle insurance policy should be compelled, first, because of alleged ambiguities in a standard Texas Personal Auto Policy, and second, because the contractual limitation on the insurer’s liability under these circumstances violates public policy. Because the stacking prohibition contained in the policy is neither ambiguous nor violative of public policy, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
I
On June 25, 1989, George Upshaw was killed when his…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Hudson Energy Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Barnett v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Puckett v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Stracener v. United Services Automobile Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. CowanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Hartrick v. Great American Lloyds Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
- Hanson v. Republic Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Lambrecht & Associates, Inc. v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.