Legal Opinion

Schultz v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1916No. Civil No. 1511PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. R. C. Stanford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

An action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence on the seventh day of November, 1914. The general demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and, the plaintiff standing upon his complaint, judgment was entered against him, from which he appeals.

It is the contention of the appellee city that it is not liable in an action for damages for personal injury, and to sustain the city’s position reliance is had. upon section 7, article 18, of Act 61 of the Session Laws of the Legislative Assembly of Arizona of 1885, and the decision of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Butner v. BoifeuilletSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. State ex rel. Reiley v. ChatfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  3. Ward v. . Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Morrell v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Kotterman v. KillianArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Taylor v. Roosevelt Irr. Dist.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hise v. City of North BendOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. New Mexico Products Co. v. New Mexico Power Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API