Legal Opinion
City of Tucson v. Polar Water Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1953No. 5607PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHELPS, Justice.
This action was instituted by the Polar Water Company, a limited partnership, to enjoin the city of Tucson, a home rule city, from extending its water service into Blenman Addition, which a short time previously had been annexed to the city of Tucson, and to enjoin it from serving the customers of plaintiff-appellee. Plaintiff and its predecessors have been engaged as a. public utility in serving water for domestic purposes to residents within the Blenman Addition since 1937. This subdivision was annexed to the city of Tucson in 1947. Plaintiff was operating under a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Alabama Power Co. v. IckesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Knoxville Water Co. v. KnoxvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Helena Water Works Co. v. HelenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Skaneateles Water Works Co. v. SkaneatelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Citizens Utilities Co. v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Mohave Disposal, Inc. v. City of KingmanArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- McMann v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- City of Tucson v. Polar Water Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Shaffer v. AlltCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.