Legal Opinion

State v. Horton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1980No. 1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Justice.

Defendant’s first two assignments of error concern the admission into evidence of two photographs of the deceased, and the clothing which the deceased was wearing at the time of the alleged murder. Defendant contends that these photographs and clothes had no probative value with respect to any issue to be determined by the jury, and were submitted solely for inflammatory purposes.

Turning first to the photographs, it is settled law in this jurisdiction that:

“Photographs are admissible ... to illustrate the testimony of a witness, and their admission for that purpose under proper…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. CrowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. CallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. PartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. CornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API