Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Urie
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 15, 1987No. C0-86-920PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
When the legislature repealed Minn.Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 6(e) (1978) (a statute which mandated that an applicant for automobile insurance be offered underinsured motorist coverage), did the repeal extinguish all claims of insureds against insurance agents or companies who negligently had failed to offer underinsured motorist coverage? That contention of appellants Joseph Urie and American Family Insurance Company (American Family) was sustained by the trial court. 1 The court of appeals concluded the trial court had erred and remanded. 2 Although we employ somewhat different…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Sandbulte v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Sobotor v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Gabrielson v. WarnemundeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Campbell v. Insurance Service AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Reitzner v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.