Legal Opinion
Sobotor v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 20, 1984PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
200 N.J. Super. 333 (1984)
491 A.2d 737
BERNARD SOBOTOR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND CHARLES REDMOND, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 24, 1984.
Decided November 20, 1984.
Before Judges MATTHEWS, FURMAN and COHEN.
Thomas Lenney argued the cause for appellants (Enright, Porter, Lenney & McGrath, attorneys; William L. Bracaglia on the brief).
Richard Wildstein argued the cause for respondent (Goldstein, Ballen, O'Rourke & Wildstein, attorneys; David Joshua Michelson on the brief).
2Per curiam
In October 1980,…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Harr v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Rider v. LynchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Bowler v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Hardt v. BrinkDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1961
- Stein v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by57 opinions
- Pickett v. Lloyd'sSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Sears Mortgage Corp. v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Carter Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Emar Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Aden v. FortshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Pizzullo v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.