Legal Opinion

Reitzner v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1993No. C3-93-1210PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant Bryan J. Reitzner is the assign-ee of a vendor’s interest in a contract for deed. Appellant asserts that he is entitled to proceeds under a fire insurance policy issued by respondent State Farm Fire and Casualty Company for losses that admittedly resulted from the vendee’s intentional act of arson. Appellant also asserts claims of negligence, reformation, fraud, and misrepresentation against respondent State Farm and respondent James Horgan, the insurance agent who sold the insurance policy at issue. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Aurelius v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Klimstra v. State Farm Auto Ins. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
  5. Life Rehab Services, Inc. v. Allied Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API