Legal Opinion

Gabrielson v. Warnemunde

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 4, 1989No. C6-88-1011PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

This case presents the issue of whether an insurance agent is under an affirmative duty to update an insurance policy at the time it is renewed or to inquire whether any changes have occurred to the insured’s property which would affect coverage. We hold as a general matter that, absent special circumstances in the relationship with the insured, an insurance agent is not under such a legal duty. Because no special circumstances exist in the present case, we reverse the court of appeals and reinstate the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the insurance agent.

Appe…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Johnson v. UrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Johnson v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank of BalatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Tollefson v. American Family Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Lowery v. Guaranty Bank and Trust Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. City of Colton v. SchwebachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Mary Cheng Lin Wang v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. Trammell v. Prairie States Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API