Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Morgan v. Strickland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2009No. 2009-0614PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an original action for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent, Governor Ted Strickland, to provide copies of certain records related to the governor’s education-funding plan. Because the requested records serve to “document the * * * functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities of the office” of the governor, see R.C. 149.011(G), particularly as they relate to his school-funding plan, we grant a limited writ of mandamus to compel the governor to continue reviewing the potentially responsive records and to provide copies of them to relator within a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New LexingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Dann v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kish v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Seneca County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. The STATE EX REL. CORDELL v. PADEN, Sheriff.Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State Ex Rel. Data Trace Information Services, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Fiscal OfficerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State ex rel. Shaughnessy v. Cleveland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Deters (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State Ex Rel. Bardwell v. Cuyahoga County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2010

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API