Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Dann v. Taft
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 2006No. 2005-1222PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
{¶ 1} This is an original action in mandamus filed by relator, Marc Dann, seeking a writ ordering respondent, Governor Bob Taft, to disclose certain weekly reports prepared for him by executive-branch officials. Dann, a member of the Ohio Senate, claims in a complaint filed in his individual capacity that the governor has a clear legal duty to disclose to Dann the weekly reports pursuant to R.C. 149.43, the Public Records Act. The governor has filed a motion for protective order relative to Dann’s discovery requests. Dann has filed a motion to compel discovery.
{¶ 2} Our decision on the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Grimes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Hurt v. Liberty Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New LexingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Glasgow v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.