Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Shaughnessy v. Cleveland (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2016No. 2015-0360PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Relator, Matthew Shaughnessy, filed this original action in mandamus alleging that respondents, the city of Cleveland and its public-records administrator, Kim Roberson (collectively, “Cleveland”), violated R.C. 149.43, Ohio’s Public Records Act, by failing to produce within eight business days the police incident reports that Shaughnessy requested. We deny Shaughnessy’s request for relief and conclude that he has not shown that Cleveland had a clear legal duty to produce, or that he had a clear legal right to receive, the records he requested within eight business days. We also deny…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Morgan v. StricklandOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State ex rel. Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State ex rel. Wadd v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Gannett GP Media, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. SafetyOhio Court of Claims · 2017
  3. State ex rel. Myers v. MeyersOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State ex rel. Stuart v. Greene (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State ex rel. Ware v. Sentence Computation Bur.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API