Legal Opinion

State v. Eastman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 1, 1992No. 90-20530; CA A66101PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant pled guilty 1 to four counts of failure to appear in the second degree. ORS 162.195. He argues that the trial court erred by imposing four judgments of conviction and sentences, because each failure to appear related to the same date, time and place. We remand for resentencing.

Defendant was scheduled to appear for sentencing on five convictions involving two incidents. The first conviction was for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. The other convictions related to a separate driving incident: reckless driving, ORS 811.140; failure to perform the duties of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. CrotsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. LinthwaiteOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LobueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. Camarena-VelascoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. ArneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. TallyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API