Legal Opinion

State v. Arney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 2010No. 070056CR; A136273PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

In this criminal case, defendant was convicted of first-degree failure to appear, ORS 162.205. She argues that the trial court erred in denying what she characterizes as her motion for a judgment of acquittal. The state responds that the trial court did not err, but that even if it did, defendant is entitled at most to a remand for entry of a conviction for second-degree failure to appear, ORS 162.195. For the reasons explained below, we agree with defendant that the trial court erred and that the state is not entitled to remand for entry of a conviction for second-degree failure to appear.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. NessOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. BarrieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. EastmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LobueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. MotaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. State v. MotaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. BaxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API