Legal Opinion
State v. Linthwaite
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1983No. CA 18242, CA 18243, CA 18244, CA 18245, CA 18246, CA 18247, SC 28017PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLent, C. J.
A poorly drafted statute and a confusing trial and appellate history leave this court with two issues to resolve. The first issue is whether ORS 166.220(1) prohibiting attempted use of a dangerous knife requires a victim in order for there to be a crime. That subsection provides:
“Any person who attempts to use, or who with intent to use the same unlawfully against another, carries or possesses a dagger, dirk, dangerous knife, razor, stiletto, or any loaded pistol, revolver or other firearm, or any instrument or weapon of the kind commonly known as a blackjack, slung shot, billy, sandclub,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PartainOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GalliganOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. TooleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.