Mack v. WP Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This employment discrimination matter came before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. In a previously issued Order, the Court granted the defendant’s motion. See Order (Sept. 28, 2012). This Opinion provides the reasoning behind that decision.1
*297I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff William A. Mack brought suit against his former employer, the WP Company, LLC, d/b/a the Washington Post (“the Post”), alleging violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq. (“FMLA”). The Court denied the Post’s motion for summary judgment on…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hardy v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and ExplosivesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Greer v. Board of Trustees University of District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Hammel v. Marsh USA Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Bartlette v. Hyatt RegencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.