Legal Opinion

Ramacciotti v. Galiano

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1943No. Civ. 12133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Plaintiffs, as copartners, brought this action to recover the possession of certain personal property, or, in the event delivery could not be had, for the sum of $2,187.-50, the alleged value thereof; also for the sum of $150 as damages for the alleged wrongful use of a tractor. A joint answer was filed by the defendants Galiano and Fornasier denying the allegations of the complaint, and the defendant McCambridge answered separately, also denying the allegations of the complaint. It was alleged in the complaint that the property involved was located on a ranch near Pescadero. It consisted of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Zeigler v. BonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Bendlage v. KohlsaatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Doud v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Carman v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Postin v. GriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Law v. HeinigerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Veitch v. EricksenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API