Legal Opinion

in the Interest of P.M., a Child

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2016No. 15-0171PublishedCited by 739 opinions

1Per curiam

Section 107.013(a) of the Texas Family Code 1 provides that “[i]n a suit filed by a governmental entity ... in which termination of the parent-child relationship ... is requested, the court shall appoint an attorney ad litem to represent the interests of ... an indigent parent_” The issue before us is whether this right to appointed counsel extends to proceedings in this Court, including the filing of a petition for review. We hold that it does and direct the trial court to appoint counsel for petitioner (hereinafter, “mother”).

The proceedings in this case have been extensive. There have been…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. High v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. In Re SchulmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Kelly, SylvesterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  5. Meza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by739 opinions

  1. In the INTEREST OF A.M. & A.M., ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. in the Interest of C.J., H.T., and B.T., ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. in the Interest of G.P., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2016
  4. in the Matter of A.H., a JuvenileCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. C.S.F. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective ServicesTexas Supreme Court · 2016

734 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API