Legal Opinion
Rostain v. Rostain
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 20, 1990No. 13697PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
This is an appeal from certain orders concerning the judgment by the trial court dissolving the marriage of the parties. We heard argument on this appeal on November 9,1989,1 after which we remanded the case to the trial court for farther proceedings. Rostain v. Rostain, 213 Conn. 686, 569 A.2d 1126 (1990). In doing so, we directed the trial court to articulate further the factual basis of certain conclusions it had reached, as we fully set out in that opinion.2 Id., 695. On March 29, 1990, the trial court filed its articulation as ordered, which permits us to proceed and dispose of this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Hartford Electric Supply Co. v. Allen-Bradley Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Dalia v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency v. Landmark Investment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Siracusa v. SiracusaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.