William M. Young and Faith Adams Young v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves the legal question whether the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has authority under the Tennes*144see Valley Authority Act of 1933, 16 U.S.C. § 831 et seq., to construct the Hartsville nuclear powered electric generating plant on a site located on the Cumberland River near Dixon Springs, Tennessee, outside the watershed of the Tennessee River. We hold that the TVA does possess such authority and it is supported by its own frequent and long standing construction of the Act and the evidence of ratification thereof by Congress.
The facts are not in dispute.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State of Alabama Ex Rel. Charles A. Graddick, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Equal Employent Opportunity Commission v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1983
- Missouri Ex Rel. Ashcroft v. Department of the Army, Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1980
- Murphy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Hoke Co., Inc. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.