Legal Opinion
Murphy v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 2, 1989No. 128-80CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge.
This case involves a suit by a retired Air Force Reserve Officer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491, et seq., as amended, seeking reinstatement, back pay, correction of military records, and other relief. The matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the parties. The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be denied in part and granted in part. The defendant’s motion for summary judgment will also be denied in part and granted in part. The court’s reasoning in reaching its conclusions on these motions follows.
FACTS
Plaintiff began his…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- James L. Murphy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Ltc. John F. Mitchell v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Paskert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Muse v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Robbins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.