Legal Opinion

Council v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

Tbe defendants Blount demurred on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against them. The other defendants answered.

The effect of a demurrer is to admit the truth of all the material facts alleged, and every intendment is adopted in behalf of the pleader. The statute (G. S., 535) requires that the complaint be liberally construed with a view to substantial justice between the parties. Ramsey v. Furniture Co., 209 N. C., 165.

To determine the correctness of the ruling of the court below, it is necessary to examine the complaint and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gibson v. . BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Hayes v. PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Ramsey v. Nash Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Roberson v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Lockridge v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Council v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API