Jessup v. Nixon
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
Are the heirs at law of a deceased mortgagor precluded from setting aside a sale of the mortgaged premises, not made in compliance with the terms of the mortgage, when at the time of said sale the estate of the mortgagor was insolvent and unable to pay more than fifty-three per cent of the indebtedness thereof?
From time immemorial it has been held by the courts that the law looks upon a mortgagor with a kindly eye, and this legal beneficence has grown into a maxim “that once a mortgage always a mortgage.” Ray v. Patterson, 170 N. C., 226, 87 S. E., 212. It is also beyond question in this…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Eubanks v. BectonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Ray v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Brett v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Rich v. . MoriseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- School Directors v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roberson v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Ingle v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Masten v. . Texas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933