De Leonis v. Hammel
California Court of Appeal
APPEALS from a judgment upon demurrer and from a judgment of nonsuit in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
TRASK, J. (pro tem.)
Two appeals have been taken in this case. The first appeal is from the judgment in favor of certain defendants, rendered because of plaintiff’s failure to amend her complaint within the time allowed by law after their demurrer thereto was sustained. The second appeal is from a judgment of nonsuit. By stipulation, both appeals have been submitted upon the same transcript.
The substance of the lengthy complaint will be stated so far as necessary for the purposes of this decision.
From the complaint it appears that plaintiff is an ignorant Indian woman. On July 31, 1894, she…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Angus v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Zellerbach v. AllenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Campbell v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Wright v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.