Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, the primary question we are asked to resolve is the following: Did the trial court err in reversing its pre-trial denial of a suppression motion upon its post-verdict conclusion that defense counsel had not, as the court initially believed, conceded that the police had not violated the “knock-and-announce” rule? Because we find no error, we affirm the order granting Aida Rodriguez an arrest of judgment and discharge and the order granting Luz Rodriguez a new trial.
On the evening of April 2, 1990, two Philadelphia police officers conducted an…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Francisco Sangineto-Miranda, (87-5667) Luray Betts, (87-5668) Enrique Vargas, (87-5711) & Benjamin Nelson, (87-5712)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Rodolfo EchegoyenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BostickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. ArdestaniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. ConstantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. ShotwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.