Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rodriguez

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1996PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals, the primary question we are asked to resolve is the following: Did the trial court err in reversing its pre-trial denial of a suppression motion upon its post-verdict conclusion that defense counsel had not, as the court initially believed, conceded that the police had not violated the “knock-and-announce” rule? Because we find no error, we affirm the order granting Aida Rodriguez an arrest of judgment and discharge and the order granting Luz Rodriguez a new trial.

On the evening of April 2, 1990, two Philadelphia police officers conducted an…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Francisco Sangineto-Miranda, (87-5667) Luray Betts, (87-5668) Enrique Vargas, (87-5711) & Benjamin Nelson, (87-5712)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Rodolfo EchegoyenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BostickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. ArdestaniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. ConstantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. ShotwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API