Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Constant

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 2007PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUSMANNO, J.:

¶ 1 Edward Constant (“Constant”) appeals from the judgment of sentence entered following his conviction of two counts of criminal attempt (homicide), three counts of aggravated assault, and one count of recklessly endangering another person.1 We affirm.

¶ 2 The trial court summarized the facts underlying the instant appeal as follows:

[O]n May 26, 2002, Mt. Lebanon Police Officers Daniel Rieg and Jeffrey Kite were called to respond to the report of a domestic disturbance at the residence that [Constant] shared with his wife, Susan Constant [“Susan”], at 105 Piper Drive in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. WestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. HanfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. KennedySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API