Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ardestani

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1999PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*194 OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

ZAPPALA, Justice.

On December 30, 1994, our Court held in Commonwealth v. Brion, 539 Pa. 256, 652 A.2d 287 (1994), that Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution precludes the police from sending an informant into the home of an individual to electronically record his conversations absent a prior determination of probable cause by a neutral, judicial authority. Allocatur was granted in the instant consolidated cases to determine the applicability of our decision in Brion. We hold that because the appellants raised and properly preserved…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. CabezaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. BrionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EllerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. FosterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. LaichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. PassmoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Passarello v. GrumbineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API