Legal Opinion

Leland v. Frogge

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1967No. 38745PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Armstrong, J. †

In December 1963, the marital community of Lynn and Helen Mansell sold to the marital community of James and Josephine Frogge the merchandise, fixtures and business known as “Kressne Dime Store” in Clarkston. The transaction was carried out by what purported by its title to be a conditional sales contract. Mr. Frogge will hereafter be referred to as the sole appellant and Mr. Mansell as the sole respondent.

Contemporaneously with the sale, Frogge negotiated a loan from a Mrs. Leland secured by a chattel mortgage on the merchandise. The current action was instituted by Mrs.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Preston v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Reed v. StreibWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Meissner v. Simpson Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Henry v. St. Regis Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Felsman v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Chase v. Daily Record, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Impecoven v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Landberg v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API