Legal Opinion

Impecoven v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1992No. 59242-0PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

The defendant Department of Revenue (DOR) seeks review of the grant by the trial court of summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs Rom Impecoven and Dan Kelly, which ordered a refund of the business and occupation (B&O) tax assessed plaintiffs on the share of insurance commissions each received from their affiliated insurance agent/broker.

Plaintiffs hold regular insurance agent licenses which authorize them to sell insurance either under a direct appointment contract with an insurance company or as an affiliate with an insurance agent holding an appointment contract. See RCW 48.17.150(1)(g);…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Weyerhaeuser Company v. TriWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Rena-Ware Distributors, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Time Oil Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lacey Nursing Center, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Electric Lightwave, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City of Spokane v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Cashmere Valley Bank v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. First American Title Insurance v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2001

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API