Legal Opinion

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Cox

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1988No. 53003-3PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodloe, J.

The defendant, Dr. Clinton C. Cox, appeals a judgment n.o.v. in favor of the plaintiff, Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company (MOE). The trial judge ruled that Cox's fraud voided his insurance policy regardless of MOE's bad faith in processing the claim. We affirm.

Cox purchased from MOE a homeowner's insurance policy covering his Clear Lake, Washington, house. The policy provided coverage for $137,000 worth of unscheduled personal property in addition to coverage for the dwelling, appurtenant structures, scheduled personal property, and living expenses.

On December 7, 1984, fire destroyed Cox's…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Baffin Land Corp. v. MONTICELLO MOT. INN., INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Khadouri Chaachou v. American Central Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. Beyer v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Saletic v. StamnesWashington Supreme Court · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Light v. Allstate InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Falk v. Keene Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Kramarevcky v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Henderson Homes, Inc. v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Oregon Mut. Ins. Co. v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API