Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2005No. 76156-6PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 We are asked to decide if the validity of a domestic violence no-contact order is an element of the crime of violating such an order. If the validity of the order is an element of the crime, then it must, of course, be decided by a jury as a matter of fact.

Chambers, J.

f 2 We hold that the “existence” of a no-contact order is an element of the crime of violating such an order. However, the “validity” of the no-contact order is a question of law appropriately within the province of the trial court to decide as part of the court’s gate-keeping function. The trial judge should not permit an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. BoyerWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. AbramsWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 2007

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API