Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2007No. 78984-3PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

J.M. Johnson, J.

The question before us is whether the classification of the underlying felony or misdemeanor is an essential element of bail jumping and therefore must be included in both the information and the to-convict jury instruction.

¶2 A jury convicted Demetrius Williams of bail jumping based on the underlying charge of possession of a controlled *181substance. On appeal, Williams argues that the information should have identified the classification (A, B, or C felony or misdemeanor) of the alleged crime. He also contends that the to-convict jury instruction should have contained the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State v. RecuencoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. RoswellWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. RoswellWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API