Legal Opinion
State v. Abrams
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 2008No. 79481-2PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
178 P.3d 1021 (2008)
STATE of Washington, Appellant,
v.
Dustin Gene ABRAMS, Respondent.
No. 79481-2.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued November 6, 2007.
Decided March 20, 2008.
John Dietrich Knodell III, Teresa Jeanne Chen, Grant County Prosecutor's Office, Ephrata, WA, for Appellant.
David Bruce Koch, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
J.M. JOHNSON, J.
¶ 1 The United States Supreme Court in both Gaudin[1] and Johnson[2] declared that the materiality of a false statement in a perjury prosecution must be submitted to a jury rather than decided by a trial judge. We must…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical Center, PSWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Davis v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- In Re the Personal Restraint of RhomeWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In re the Personal Restraint of HaghighiWashington Supreme Court · 2013
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.