Legal Opinion

Comfort & Fleming Insurance Brokers, Inc. v. Hoxsey

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 19, 1980No. 3631-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, J. *

—This appeal concerns the interpretation of certain restrictive covenants contained in a contract of employment. The trial court granted judgment to plaintiff Comfort & Fleming Insurance Brokers, Inc., after finding that defendant breached the terms of the contract dated July 30, 1970. Defendant Gerald L. Hoxsey appeals. He makes three assignments of error:

1. The trial court erred in finding that Hoxsey's employment status was terminated on December 31, 1974, for "good cause shown" under the contract (findings of fact Nos. 7 and 8);

2. The trial court erred in finding that Hoxsey…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Roberts v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. State ex rel. Hart v. Common CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Stender v. Twin City Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Donald R. Scribner v. Worldcom, Inc., a Georgia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Barrett v. Weyerhaeuser Co. Severance Pay PlanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Kloss v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. Danzer v. Professional Insurors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Todd Pierce, / Cross- App. v. Bill And Melinda Gates Foundation, / Cross-res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API