Legal Opinion

Will & Baumer Candle Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 15, 1948No. C. D. 1146PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OlivbR, Chief Judge:

The merchandise covered by this protest consists of glass containers, invoiced as “empty glass jars,” imported from Canada, which were assessed with duty as decorated articles, in chief value of glass, not specially provided for, at the rate of 60 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 218 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims that they are properly dutiable as unfilled “jars” in chief value of glass, not specially provided for, at the rate of -K cent per pound under the provisions of paragraph 217 of the same act, as modified by the trade…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. Koscherak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riekes Crisa Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  2. Endicott Johnson Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. United States v. N. M. Albert Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  4. Will & Baumer Candle Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  5. Winter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API