Legal Opinion
Lindauer v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 11, 1970No. Civ. No. 70-244PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
In this case, Plaintiff claims that Title 11, Oklahoma Statutes, Sections 1601 to 1620 inclusive (the Oklahoma Urban Development Law for cities of over 100.000 population) is unconstitutional and that its enforcement against him in taking certain properties situated in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and belonging to him denies him the equal protection of the laws in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In this connection, it is Plaintiff’s contention that the above laws do not afford the citizens of Oklahoma City,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Isaacs v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Pfizer Inc. v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
- City of Kansas City v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
3Cited by2 opinions
- Herbert Loyd Lindauer v. The Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority, a Public Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Lindauer v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972